Skip to main content
Fig. 8 | Cancer Cell International

Fig. 8

From: Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance APT and DKI imaging for breast cancer

Fig. 8

ROC curves of each quantitative parameter on ER (A), PR (B), HER2 (C), and lymph node metastasis status (D). (A) AUC (Kapp) = 0.695, AUC (Dapp) = 0.690, AUC (APT) = 0.541, and AUC (ADC) = 0.677. (B) AUC (Kapp) = 0.651, AUC (Dapp) = 0.638, AUC (APT) = 0.524, and AUC (ADC) = 0.665. (C) AUC (Kapp) = 0.650, AUC (Dapp) = 0.650, AUC (APT) = 0.645, and AUC (ADC) = 0.699. (D) AUC (Kapp) = 0.596, AUC (Dapp) = 0.546, AUC (APT) = 0.508, and AUC (ADC) = 0.629. No considerable difference in AUCs of other parameters and methods was noted. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; APT, amide proton transfer; AUC, area under the curve; Dapp, apparent diffusivity; DKI, diffusion kurtosis imaging; Kapp, apparent kurtosis coefficient

Back to article page