Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of parameters among prognostic factors of breast cancer

From: Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance APT and DKI imaging for breast cancer

Factors

Number of patients

Kapp

P value

Dapp

P value

MTRasym

P value

ADC

P value

ER

  

0.005

 

0.0038

 

0.8770

 

0.0015

positive

80

0.97 ± 0.33

 

1.06 ± 0.47

 

2.77 ± 1.27

 

0.75 ± 0.16

 

negative

33

0.80 ± 0.21

 

1.36 ± 0.57

 

2.81 ± 1.18

 

0.90 ± 0.34

 

PR

  

0.0137

 

0.0361

 

0.9912

 

0.0060

positive

76

0.97 ± 0.33

 

1.08 ± 0.49

 

2.78 ± 1.27

 

0.75 ± 0.18

 

negative

37

0.82 ± 0.23

 

1.29 ± 0.56

 

2.78 ± 1.18

 

0.88 ± 0.32

 

HER-2

  

0.0801

 

0.2400

 

0.0251

 

0.0545

positive

23

0.82 ± 0.18

 

1.26 ± 0.38

 

2.27 ± 1.10

 

0.88 ± 0.22

 

negative

90

0.95 ± 0.33

 

1.12 ± 0.55

 

2.91 ± 1.24

 

0.77 ± 0.24

 

Ki-67

  

0.5422

 

0.4192

 

0.3236

 

0.1672

positive

92

0.93 ± 0.25

 

1.13 ± 0.51

 

2.72 ± 1.15

 

0.78 ± 0.24

 

negative

21

0.87 ± 0.49

 

1.23 ± 0.55

 

3.02 ± 1.57

 

0.86 ± 0.23

 

Lymph node status

  

0.0470

 

0.6695

 

0.6269

 

0.1593

positive

74

0.97 ± 0.32

 

1.13 ± 0.54

 

2.80 ± 1.28

 

0.77 ± 0.25

 

negative

37

0.84 ± 0.28

 

1.12 ± 0.50

 

2.68 ± 1.12

 

0.84 ± 0.22

 

Tumor diameter

  

0.0537

 

0.6389

 

0.6530

 

0.5961

≥ 2 cm

96

0.95 ± 0.30

 

1.16 ± 0.52

 

2.80 ± 1.20

 

0.80 ± 0.25

 

<2 cm

17

0.79 ± 0.31

 

1.09 ± 0.51

 

2.65 ± 1.50

 

0.76 ± 0.18

 
  1. Note ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; Dapp, apparent diffusivity; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; Kapp, apparent kurtosis coefficient; MTRasym (3.5 ppm), asymmetric magnetization transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm; PR, progesterone receptor