Skip to main content

Migrasomes, critical players in intercellular communication

Abstract

Migrasomes are a newly discovered type of extracellular vesicle (EV) formed during cell migration, playing a pivotal role in intercellular communication. These vesicles are generated by retracting fibers of migrating cells and encapsulate various molecules, such as proteins, lipids, and RNA, allowing the transfer of biochemical signals to neighboring cells. Current evidence suggests that migrasomes are involved in a wide range of physiological processes such as embryogenesis, angiogenesis, immune modulation, and mitochondrial quality control. Moreover, migrasomes are implicated in pathological conditions, including cancer metastasis, cardiovascular diseases, and viral infections. To fully understand their significance, it is critical to first explore the molecular mechanisms underlying their formation and function. Recent studies have shed light on the biogenesis, release, and biological properties of migrasomes, all of which are key to understanding their role in cell-to-cell communication. In this review, we provide an up-to-date summary of migrasome biogenesis, release, characterization, and their biological activities in intercellular communication, while also proposing potential new functions for these vesicles.

Introduction

Intercellular communication, a crucial feature of multicellular organisms, is mediated through direct cell–cell contacts or the transfer of secreted molecules. Emerging evidence highlights the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in this process. EVs are released by cells under both normal and pathological conditions, serving diverse biological functions and being found in various body fluids. These vesicles are essential for maintaining physiological balance, and their release often increases in response to homeostatic challenges [1]. EVs refer to a heterogeneous group of membrane-bound structures that vary in size, origin, and biological function. All cells, from bacteria to humans and plants, secrete different types of EVs or nanoparticles, a process conserved through evolution. EVs can be classified into various subtypes based on their characteristics, including exosomes, ectosomes, migrasomes, apoptotic bodies, retractosomes, exomeres, and oncosomes (Fig. 1). Each subtype has distinct mechanisms of synthesis and release, contributing to their role in intercellular communication (Table 1) [2,3,4].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timeline of key discoveries leading to migrasome identification. In 1945, initial observations identified filaments associated with cell retraction [16]. By 1963, these were further characterized as long tubular structures known as retractile fibers [17]. In 2012, pomegranate-like structures were observed attached to these fibers [18]. The formal naming of these migratory, pomegranate-like structures as “migrasomes” occurred in 2015, linking them explicitly to cell migration [19]. This progression highlights the gradual unveiling of migrasomes’ unique morphology and their role in cellular dynamics

Table 1 Characteristics of common extracellular vesicles

Among these, exosomes, ranging in size from 50 to 150 nm, are EVs that originate from the endocytic pathway. They result from the fusion of late endosomes/multivesicular bodies (MVBs) with the plasma membrane and are enriched with endosomal sorting complex proteins required for trafficking, such as ALG-2 interacting protein X (Alix) and tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein (TSG101), as well as tetraspanins such as CD63 and CD81 [5]. Exosomes can carry proteins, RNAs, miRNAs and other substances, mediating intercellular communication without direct cell-to-cell contact [5]. In contrast, microvesicles, ranging from 100 to 1000 nm in size, bud from the plasma membrane and contain specific proteins such as annexin A1 and annexin A2 [6]. Apoptotic bodies, which range from 50 to 5000 nm, are released from dying cells by vesiculation and rupture of the cell membrane [3], carrying fragmented proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. And retractosomes range in size from 50 to 250 nm. They are formed by the breakage of retraction fibers produced by migrating cells. Cholesterol is much less enriched on retractosomes than on migrasomes. This suggests that retractosomes may form by mechanisms other than the assembly of tetraspanin-enriched macrodomains, which is different from migrasome formation. Currently, their specific functions remain unclear, but they may have potential roles in intercellular communication and other aspects [7]. Additionally, large oncosomes (1000 to 10000 nm) contain abnormal and transformed macromolecules, such as oncoproteins, that play a role in cancer progression [8]. The newly discovered exomeres, typically smaller than 50 nm, also contribute to intercellular communication and potentially influence target cell metabolism, particularly glycolysis [9].

In recent years, migrasomes have emerged as a distinct subtype of EVs, characterized by their formation during cell migration. These vesicles not only differ in size—ranging from 500 to 3000 nm—but also in their unique biogenesis and cargo loading mechanisms [10, 11]. Migrasomes form through the retraction of membrane tethers extended by the posterior region of migrating cells, creating vesicles that contain numerous smaller vesicles, with diameters between 50 and 100 nm, inside them [11]. Migrasomes have shown great potential in facilitating communication between cells by establishing complex gradients and conveying signals in a spatiotemporal manner [12, 13]. Moreover, they are involved in a wide array of cellular functions, including immune regulation, mitochondrial quality control, and the lateral transfer of materials between cells [12, 14]. Despite the significant progress in understanding migrasomes, a critical knowledge gap remains in terms of the precise molecular mechanisms that dictate how specific cargos-such as RNA and proteins-are selectively sorted into migrasomes, rather than other EVs, under different physiological conditions. It is well established that tetraspanin proteins, such as CD63 and CD81, play a role in stabilizing the structure of migrasomes, but how these vesicles selectively package their contents remains poorly understood [15]. Addressing this unresolved issue is particularly important in the context of cancer metastasis, where the differential sorting of molecular cargos could influence the behavior and fate of metastatic cells. This area of research holds the potential to provide new insights into how migrasomes contribute to disease progression and to uncover novel therapeutic targets.

Therefore, the objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the current status of migrasome research, focusing on their formation mechanisms, physiological functions, and their significance in disease diagnosis and treatment. By exploring these aspects, we aim to highlight the critical areas that require further investigation, particularly the unresolved question of cargo sorting, which could have profound implications for understanding migrasome roles in health and disease.

The discovery of Retraction fibers and migrasomes

As early as 1945, Porter et al. [16] first observed filaments potentially associated with the retraction margins of cells. This initial observation set the stage for more detailed investigations, particularly by Taylor and Robbins in 1963, who employed optical and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to document long tubular structures known as “retractile fibers.” These fibers appear when migrating cells retract from the underlying layer and are characterized by a non-uniform diameter, being anchored at the tip and remaining stationary when stretched. When relaxed or detached, they are passively disturbed by the movement of particles in Brownian motion [17]. In 2012, Yu et al. [18] utilized TEM to observe membrane-bound vesicular structures in the extracellular space surrounding normal rat kidney (NRK) cells. These structures were found to be connected to or closely associated with retraction fibers and exhibited diameters ranging from 0.5 μm to 3 μm, containing numerous smaller vesicles that resembled opened pomegranates. Further investigations using additional electron microscopy revealed that these pomegranate-like structures (PLSs) were indeed attached to contractile fibers. Subsequent studies indicated that the formation of PLSs could be inhibited by blocking cell migration, suggesting a strong correlation between PLS formation and cellular movement. Consequently, in a pivotal study published in 2015, these structures were named “migrasomes”, reflecting their association with cellular migration and their unique morphological characteristics (Fig. 2) [19].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) classifcation. This diagram provides a comprehensive overview of EV classification and biogenesis, emphasizing their size, cellular origin, and mechanisms of formation. EVs are categorized into small vesicles, including exomeres (<50 nm), exosomes (30–150 nm) derived from multivesicular bodies, and ectosomes (100–1000 nm) directly shed from the plasma membrane. The large vesicles comprise migrasomes (500–3000 nm) produced during cell migration, apoptotic bodies (1000–5000 nm) formed during apoptosis, and oncosomes (1000–10000 nm) associated with tumor cells. It emphasizes the distinct formation pathways for each EV type, including endosomal sorting, membrane budding, and cellular migration, demonstrating how these processes facilitate their release into the extracellular space

The biogenesis of migrasomes

During cell migration, the formation of migrasomes and retraction fibers (RFs) relies on the support of the extracellular matrix (ECM). For instance, researchers cultured L929 cells on fibronectin-coated microwell plates and, using WGA labeling and Opera Phenix system detection, observed that higher fibronectin concentrations enhanced migrasome formation, with an optimal concentration of 10 µg/ml. These findings highlight the critical role of ECM components, such as fibronectin, in migrasome formation and their close association with this process [20]. The formation of migrasomes is closely linked to the dynamic process of cell migration. As cells migrate, they deposit retraction fibers at the trailing edge, where localized plasma membrane protrusions give rise to migrasomes, particularly at the terminations and bifurcations of these fibers. As migration progresses, the connecting RFs gradually thin out and eventually rupture, exposing migrasomes to the surrounding ECM. At this stage, migrasomes may either be captured by neighboring cells or undergo rupture to release their contents. This process further underscores the essential role of the ECM in both the formation and dynamic regulation of migrasomes [19]. Recent research has revealed that membrane tension plays a pivotal role in migrasome formation, regulated by actin polymerization and the interaction of tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs) with Rab35 and PI(4,5)P2. This coordinated action ensures the stabilization and expansion of migrasomes, but the exact biophysical mechanisms that regulate membrane tension during migrasome formation remain underexplored. Membrane tension initiates localized swellings on the retraction fibers, which subsequently develop into migrasomes [20, 21].

Using quantitative mass spectrometry, Yu et al. discovered that the proteins enriched within the migrasomes are involved in various cellular processes including cell migration, cell-substrate adhesion, lipid catabolism, protein glycosylation and glycoprotein metabolism [22]. Additionally, they observed a high enrichment of tetraspanin (TSPAN) family members within the migrasome. The TSPAN family comprises 33 members, which are ubiquitously expressed in various cell types and possess four transmembrane domains [23, 24]. These proteins can segregate into tetraspaninenriched microdomains (TEMs) within the cellular membrane, contributing to diverse physiological processes such as cell adhesion, migration, immune response, fusion, and organ-specific signaling [25]. In vitro system simulation indicates that TSPAN4 and cholesterol alone are sufficient to generate migrasome-like structures [26]. In the realm of membrane biology, highlighting the role of certain tetraspanins, such as Tspan4, as curvature-sensing proteins is essential. Research on CD9 has shown that it can specifically accumulate on highly curved membrane structures. Similarly, Tspan4 has the ability to enrich membrane regions with high positive curvature, like retraction fiber nanotubes. These unique membrane structures are actively involved in various crucial cellular processes, including cell migration and signal transduction. Understanding the function of Tspan4 in this context may provide new insights into the complex membrane - related mechanisms within cells and open up novel avenues for future research [27]. The recent findings by Dharan et al. [28] have unveiled a two step process of migrasome formation through the utilization of live cell imaging and biomimetic model systems. The initial step is driven by membrane tension, leading to the development of localized swellings on tubular contractile fibers. Subsequently, specific proteins from the TSPAN family regulate the second step, facilitating the stabilization of these swellings and their eventual transformation into migrasomes. Subsequent studies have confirmed that TSPAN4 is overexpressed in the formation of migrasomes and has also been used as a marker for migrasomes [22].

The biogenesis of migrasomes is a tightly regulated process that encompasses three distinct stages: nucleation, maturation, and expansion (Fig. 3). Synthesis of sphingomyelin (SM) has been established as a prerequisite for the formation of migrasomes during the initial stages of migrasome formation. Liang et al. [29] discovered that migrasomes exhibit an enrichment of SM, and they identified sphingomyelin synthase 2 (SMS2) as a crucial protein involved in the biogenesis of migrasomes. In their study, firstly, SMS2 assembles into immobile foci that adhere on the basal membrane at the leading edge, where it determines the precise location for future migrasome formation sites; secondly, SMS2 foci remains localized on RFs and serves as the designated site for migrasome formation. Finally, ceramide undergoes conversion to SM at the SMS2 foci, thereby triggering the growth phase of migrasome formation. Furthermore, both CerS5, which is essential for long-chain ceramide synthesis, and CERT, responsible for transporting ceramides from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus, are indispensable for migrasome formation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Stages of migrasome formation: nucleation, maturation, and expansion. Nucleation involves SMS2 catalyzing sphingomyelin formation at the cell membrane. Maturation is driven by PIP5K1A, PI(4)P, PI(4,5)P2, Rab35, and integrins, which promote membrane budding and protrusion development. Expansion involves the assembly of tetraspanin-enriched macrodomains (TEMs), extending the migrasome structure. Key molecular components like lipids, receptors, and integrins are crucial at each stage, emphasizing the pathways essential for migrasome development

Subsequent research has revealed that Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase (PIP5K1A) facilitates the re-synthesis of Phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate (PI (4,5) P2) at the migrasomes formation site prior to its assembly [21]. Rab35, a PI (4,5) P2 binding protein localized within the migrasomes, is recruited to the migrasomes formation site through its interaction with PI (4,5) P2. Subsequently, via its interaction with integrin α5, Rab35 recruits integrin α5 to the migrasome formation site and primes it for tetraptransmembrane-dependent amplification [21]. Tropomyosin-1, a coiled-coil protein that stabilizes actin filaments, is a key regulator of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-mediated migrasome formation in endothelial cells (ECs) [30]. Gagat et al. [31] note that angiogenic capacity and migrasome formation are augmented in TNFα-activated ECs with a knockout of tropomyosin-1, indicating the regulatory effect of tropomyosin-1 on migrasome formation. Moreover, the biogenesis of migrasomes is contingent on the cellular milieu, notably involving integrins and tetraspanins. Specifically, the integrin α5β1 is essential for anchoring migrasomes to the extracellular matrix, enabling their formation at designated cell migration sites [19].

Actin polymerization is another critical factor in migrasome biogenesis. Actin facilitates the membrane tension needed for migrasome expansion and stability. Yu et al. [19] demonstrated that inhibiting actin polymerization with Cytochalasin B and Latrunculin A, or disrupting the formation of branched actin networks with CK636, significantly diminishes migrasome formation. These findings indicate that actin polymerization plays a dual role, both in promoting cell migration and directly contributing to migrasome biogenesis. Using live cell imaging experiments, Fan et al. [32]observed a reduction in the formation of RFs and migrasomes when L929 cells exhibited discontinuous migration in one direction during rotation. Moreover, increased cell migration duration and velocity resulted in enhanced migrasome formation, suggesting that continuous and directional cell migration, coupled with proper membrane tension and actin dynamics, is essential for migrasome formation.

Detection and isolation of migrasomes

Currently, the most accurate method for identifying migrasomes is still through transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Research has shown that Tspan4, integrin, and pleckstrin homeodomains can serve as reliable markers for observing migrasomes using fluorescence microscopy [19, 33, 34]. However, due to the high abundance of TSPAN4 and integrin in exosomes, distinguishing migrasomes from exosomes solely based on the detection of TSPAN4 and integrin as markers may pose a challenge [10]. By tagging them with GFP or mCherry, the biogenesis of migrasomes can be visualized. There are also several markers that can be analyzed by protein blotting to rapidly determine the presence of migrasomes [10]. The binding ability of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) to sialic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine enables the staining of migrasomes, and efficiently labels cells, retractile fibers, and migrasomes in a very short period of time, offering significant advantages in tracking their trajectory. The migrasome is rich in many protein markers, such as carboxypeptidase Q (CPQ), EGF domain-specific O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (EOGT), bifunctional heparin sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 1 (NDST1), and phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class K (PIGK). These protein markers can be used to distinguish between migrasomes and other EVs [35].

The comprehensive protocol for migrasome isolation has been extensively elucidated in the study conducted by Yu et al. [22]. The isolation process for migrasomes, akin to that of other extracellular vesicles (EVs), involves extracting these structures from body fluids and conditioned cell culture media through a combination of ultracentrifugation and density gradient centrifugation [36]. Recently, Yang et al. introduced an innovative, straightforward, and efficient technique for the isolation and quantitative analysis of migrasomes. This method utilizes WGA-conjugated magnetic beads alongside flow cytometry (WBFC), enabling effective isolation of migrasomes from serum or urine samples. Furthermore, this technique facilitates the analysis of their lipid, protein, and RNA profiles, providing valuable insights into the molecular composition and potential functional roles of migrasomes in various biological contexts [37].

Biological functions of migrasomes

Migrasomes are enriched with a diverse array of signaling molecules, including cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, which they transport to neighboring cells, thereby significantly influencing cellular behavior and fate. During embryonic development, migrasomes provide critical regional cues by delivering chemotactic factors, such as CXCL12, which guide cellular organization and tissue patterning. Moreover, migrasomes are integral to maintaining mitochondrial quality control by facilitating the expulsion of damaged mitochondria during mild stress. This process, known as mitocytosis, is essential for preserving cellular homeostasis, particularly in highly migratory cells like neutrophils and macrophages [12]. Additionally, migrasomes contribute to angiogenesis by delivering pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGFA, thereby promoting vascular development in both physiological and pathological contexts [38, 39]. These multifaceted roles of migrasomes underscore their importance in various biological processes, from development to immune responses, highlighting their potential as targets for therapeutic interventions (Fig. 4) [40].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mechanisms of migrasome-mediated intercellular communication. The diagram depicts various biological roles associated with migrasomes, including the release of signaling molecules, shedding of cellular contents, and lateral transfer of materials between cells. Migrasomes facilitate communication and material exchange, influencing processes such as immune response, tissue repair, and development. The functions highlighted underscore the diverse and dynamic contributions of migrasomes to cellular and physiological processes, with some aspects remaining to be fully elucidated

Regulation of embryonic development

Recent in vivo experiments have demonstrated that organ morphogenesis in zebrafish is dependent on migrasomes, which are enriched with signaling molecules that provide essential regional biochemical cues for accurate cellular localization [33]. Specifically, mesodermal and endodermal cells generate migrasomes rich in CXCL12. The interaction between CXCL12 within these migrasomes and its receptor, CXCR4, expressed on dorsal precursor cells (DFCS), triggers chemotaxis and facilitates the recruitment of DFCS. This interaction is crucial for ensuring the precise localization of DFCS and the subsequent processes of organ morphogenesis [33]. Additionally, polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs, 50 nm) have been shown to inhibit ROCK1-mediated migration, invasion, and migrasome formation, leading to adverse reproductive outcomes such as miscarriage in pregnant mice [41]. Furthermore, ROCK1 has been implicated in regulating migrasome formation in zebrafish embryos, further emphasizing its importance in developmental processes. In essence, migrasomes represent a fundamental component of the cellular framework during embryonic development [19]. Their ability to transmit signals and engage with neighboring cells underscores their integral role in orchestrating the complexities of embryogenesis. Investigating the precise roles and mechanisms of migrasomes in these developmental processes could yield significant insights into the intricacies of developmental biology and its associated disorders.

Mitochondria quality control

Under conditions of mild mitochondrial stress, damaged mitochondria are transported into migrasomes, where they undergo processing and subsequent excretion from migrating cells [12]. This process positions migrasomes as crucial players in maintaining cellular homeostasis and ensuring mitochondrial quality control by facilitating the elimination of dysfunctional organelles. Notably, neutrophils and macrophages have been identified as primary sources of migrasomes [42]. When these immune cells experience mild mitochondrial stress, they can modulate their intracellular transport mechanisms, evading the binding of damaged mitochondria to dynein while enhancing their interaction with Kinesin Family Member 5B (KIF5B) through mitochondrial quality control pathways. This dynamic adjustment allows for the effective transportation of impaired mitochondria into migrasomes, which are then collectively excreted. By doing so, macrophages and neutrophils maintain their cell viability and functional capacity, illustrating the critical role of migrasomes in cellular stress responses and organelle homeostasis [12].

Promote angiogenesis

In the context of angiogenesis, Zhang et al. [39] discovered that monocytes play a significant role in capillary formation in chicken embryos through the production of migrasomes. These migrasomes, which are enriched with key signaling molecules such as vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and CXCL12, not only facilitate capillary formation but also actively recruit additional monocytes to the site of angiogenesis within the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo. This finding underscores the critical role of migrasomes in angiogenesis, a process essential for physiological development as well as pathological conditions, including tumor growth and peripheral nerve regeneration. The involvement of monocytes and macrophages in this process—highlighted by their secretion of pro-angiogenic factors via migrasomes—reveals a novel aspect of the cellular mechanisms driving blood vessel formation and tissue repair. Understanding these interactions may open new avenues for therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing or inhibiting angiogenesis in various clinical settings.

Recruiting cancer cells

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), known for their multipotency and self-renewal capabilities, play a critical role in the bone marrow stem cell niche, significantly contributing to the process of hematopoiesis [43, 44]. Recent research by Deniz et al. [15] has illuminated the ability of MSCs to generate migrasomes, which are enriched with essential signaling molecules, including stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1 or CXCL12). These migrasomes facilitate the migration of hematopoietic cells, such as KG-1a cells and primary CD34 + hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), underscoring their importance in cellular communication within the bone marrow microenvironment. Notably, Deniz et al. [15] found that leukemic cells exhibit a preferential uptake of migrasomes compared to primary CD34 + progenitors, suggesting a differential impact of these vesicles on various cell types within the bone marrow. This observation raises important implications: in pathological conditions like cancer, tumor cells may alter the normal exchange of material and information between healthy cells. Such modifications can lead to changes in the cellular microenvironment that promote tumor growth and metastasis, highlighting the potential role of migrasomes in cancer progression and offering insights into new therapeutic strategies targeting the tumor microenvironment.

Regulation of immunity

The immune system cells are the primary mobile cell types in organisms, and their function relies on the production of cytokines and chemokines. The immune response necessitates the involvement of diverse cell types, with migrasomes facilitating communication between immune cells to orchestrate the immune response [11]. Li et al. [45] discovered that upon bacterial stimulation, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) were loaded with the antimicrobial peptide dermcidin. In vivo tracking experiments revealed that these BM-MSCs rapidly penetrated into the lungs and disappeared within 24 h, leaving behind migration bodies rich in antimicrobial peptide dermcidin, which enhanced LC3-associated phagocytosis of macrophages and improved bacterial clearance. Therefore, the migrasomes of dermcidin-enriched MSCs can effectively reduce lung bacterial load and enhance LC3-associated phagocytosis, making it a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of post-stroke pneumonia [45]. The study conducted by Hyun et al. [46] revealed the presence of membrane-covered structures measuring approximately 1 μm in diameter along the migratory path of neutrophils. These structures were found to release CXCL12 and serve as guidance cues for T cells, directing their movement along the same path as neutrophil migration. In contrast, Lim et al. [47] discovered that the depletion of neutrophil-derived CXCL12 and the antagonism of CXCR4 disrupted the guidance of T cell migration by neutrophils. This intricate interplay between migrasomes and immune cell functions holds promising implications for disease treatment.

The study conducted by Wang et al. [48] unveils a critical mechanism wherein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), a molecule known for its immune checkpoint function, is abundantly present in the retraction fibers and migrasomes at the rear of migrating cancer cells. The presence of PD-L1-enriched migrasomes contributes to a suppressive immune microenvironment by potentially being internalized by neighboring cells, thereby upregulating PD-L1 expression and subsequently dampening the immune response. These migrasomes may also release chemokines, facilitating the migration of both tumor and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment, thus enhancing metastatic capabilities [22]. Additionally, through the utilization of pan-cancer analysis and single-cell sequencing techniques, Qing et al. [49] discovered a strong correlation between genes associated with migrasomes and immune evasion as well as the tumor microenvironment. This finding suggests that these migrasomes hold potential as therapeutic targets for tumors, while their heightened expression levels serve as an indicator of unfavorable prognosis.

Lateral transfer of material between cells

The role of migrasomes in the lateral transfer of mRNA and protein is crucial, as they can regulate the physiological state and function of recipient cells through the transmission of genetic information and proteins. Migrasomes can transfer cellular contents into neighboring cells. Migrasomes are rich in PTEN protein, and upon addition of migrasomes to recipient tumor cells, PTEN protein can be translated into recipient cells, thereby reducing pAKT activity and inhibiting tumor cell proliferation [50]. The behavior of recipient cells can be influenced by migrasomes, which play a crucial role in mediating lateral transfer of mRNA and protein [51]. This phenomenon contributes to various physiological and pathological processes, offering novel opportunities for therapeutic intervention and enhancing our understanding of diseases. Cytosolic contents can be actively transported into and then released from the cell through the migrasome, a process called " migracytosis“ [19]. Many important physiological functions such as the formation of neuronal networks and innate and adaptive immune responses require material transport between cells, which also proved the important role of migracytosis in intercellular communication.

Migrasomes with disease

Migrasomes are increasingly recognized for their role in various diseases, acting as key mediators of pathological processes (Fig. 5). The dual role of migrasomes in health and disease presents both challenges and opportunities. In cancer, migrasomes may promote tumor progression by transferring pro-oncogenic molecules, aiding metastasis and tumor growth. In cardiovascular diseases, they contribute to thrombosis by delivering coagulation factors, increasing the risk of clot formation. Beyond these, migrasomes are also implicated in neurodegenerative diseases and other conditions characterized by inflammation and abnormal cell migration. Given their role in mediating intercellular communication, migrasomes hold significant potential as biomarkers for disease diagnosis, particularly in conditions such as acute myocardial infarction and cancer metastasis. Understanding how migrasomes function across different diseases is essential, as their ability to modulate cell signaling could lead to novel therapeutic approaches for treating diseases marked by dysregulated cell migration.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Multifaceted physiological and pathological roles of migrasomes. Migrasomes are implicated in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke), supporting cellular repair processes and influencing inflammatory pathways [67, 70]. They contribute to tumor progression in cancers such as gastric, liver, and glioma, and interact with viral pathogens like SARS-CoV-2, affecting immune responses and thrombosis [53, 56]. Additionally, migrasomes aid tissue regeneration, supporting fat and bone healing and providing early diagnostic potential for kidney injury, highlighting their pivotal role in intercellular communication and therapeutic applications [80]

Tumors with the migrasomes

The protein CD151 belongs to a family of four proteins and plays a crucial role in angiogenesis and cancer metastasis [52]. Zhang et al. [53]demonstrated that increased expression of CD151 upregulated the expression of migrasomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), thereby enhancing the invasive properties of HCC cells. Furthermore, migrasomes enriched with VEGF promotes angiogenesis, increasing the likelihood of HCC metastasis. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that plays a crucial role in the progression of Glioblastoma (GBM) by activating downstream signaling pathways [54]. TSPAN4, identified as a marker protein for migrasomes, has been confirmed by Dong et al.‘s study to promote GBM progression through the activation of the EGFR signaling pathway [55]. This suggests that targeted therapy against TSPAN4 could potentially offer significant clinical benefits to GBM patients. Qi et al. discovered a significant upregulation of TSPAN4 expression in gastric cancer tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues [56]. Suppression of TSPAN4 resulted in inhibited proliferation of gastric cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, indicating its potential role in impeding the progression of gastric cancer. Through genome-scale CRISPR activation screening, Zhao et al. identified a correlation between TSPAN4 and resistance to chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. TSPAN4 is found to be upregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and significantly contributes to the development of paclitaxel resistance by inhibiting cellular apoptosis [57].The study conducted by Gu et al. [58]demonstrated a potential association between migrasomes and the underlying mechanism of early tumor metastasis to bone, suggesting that migrasomes could serve as one of the primary targets for intervention in secondary bone metastasis of malignant tumors.

Virus with the migrasomes

As a member of the EVs family, migrasomes also play a pivotal role in immune response and viral infection [59]. Tetraspanins contain four transmembrane domains and play a significant role in viral infections. They can mediate viral adsorption and invasion. For example, CD81, as a receptor for hepatitis C virus, binds to the viral envelope protein through its transmembrane domain to facilitate the virus’s entry into the cell. They also participate in viral assembly and release. For instance, TSPAN8 helps in the assembly of hepatitis B virus particles. Additionally, tetraspanins can regulate the host immune response and have an indirect effect on viral infections by influencing the activation of immune cells and the secretion of cytokines. Moreover, they can promote the spread of viruses between cells, creating a microenvironment conducive to viral spread and mediating the transfer of viruses between cells [60,61,62]. The interaction between viruses and platelets occurs through both ACE2-dependent and independent pathways, resulting in platelet activation, aggregation, and the subsequent release of various EVs, including migrasomes [63]. Notably, the release of migrasomes from platelets infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virions has been implicated in immune dysregulation and thrombosis, exacerbating the complications associated with COVID-19 [64]. In a significant finding, Lv et al. [65]demonstrated that the vaccinia virus (VACV) can induce migrasome formation, suggesting a potential mechanism for poxvirus transmission. However, further investigations are essential to elucidate the complex mechanisms underlying VACV-mediated migrasome formation and to explore the therapeutic potential of targeting migrasomes for antiviral drug development. Understanding these pathways could lead to innovative strategies for managing viral infections and their associated complications.

Migrasomes and cardiovascular system diseases

The involvement of migrasomes is essential in various physiological processes, including thrombosis, coagulation, angiogenesis, vascular injury response, and heart diseases [66]. The study conducted by Jiang et al. [67] revealed that migrasomes derived from neutrophils in the bloodstream exhibit a high concentration of adhesion molecules and coagulation factors, indicating a close association with cardiovascular homeostasis. This suggests that migrasomes may have implications for cardiovascular diseases. Zheng et al. [68]recently discovered a strong correlation between TSPAN4 expression and the occurrence of atherogenic plaque rupture and intraplaque hemorrhage. Furthermore, they observed an upregulation of TSPAN4 expression in a mouse model of spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), indicating that both TSPAN4 and migrasomes could potentially serve as therapeutic targets for treating atherosclerosis and MI [68]. Zhu et al. demonstrated that migrasomes hold great potential as a biomarker for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [69]. Sun et al. [70] demonstrated that mechanical stimulation of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) mitigated myocardial infarct size and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) by enhancing impaired mitochondrial excretion through migrasome-dependent mitosis. This may offer a novel, noninvasive, non-pharmacological approach for the treatment of MIRI.

Migrasomes and nervous system diseases

The accumulation of amyloid beta protein (Aβ) in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) compromises the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Hu et al. [71]demonstrated a positive correlation between the Aβ40-induced macrophage-derived migrasomes and the severity of CAA. Furthermore, they found that these migrasomes were responsible for mediating BBB damage. Therefore, macrophage-derived migrasomes hold potential as both biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CAA [71]. A high-sodium diet promotes ischemic injury of the central nervous system and induces the generation of a substantial number of migrasomes in the ischemic brain tissue. Adjacent to these migratory cells, both atrophied and intact neurons were observed, along with the evidence of neuronal fragments within the migrasomes. This phenomenon may be attributed to two distinct mechanisms: firstly, migrasomes might infiltrate into intact neurons’ cytoplasm, leading to neuronal death and exacerbating ischemic cell damage; secondly, migrasomes could uptake debris from damaged neurons and thus serve as transporters [72]. Hence, migrasomes may play a role in the pathological process of acute stroke and represent potential targets for its treatment.

Migrasomes and kidney disease

Podocytes are specialized renal cells that play a crucial role in maintaining the glomerular filtration barrier. During the process of migration, particularly following podocyte injury, these cells release migrasomes—small extracellular vesicles that facilitate intercellular communication and tissue remodeling. Notably, this release of migrasomes is significantly enhanced in pathological conditions, as demonstrated in both mouse models of nephropathy and in patients experiencing renal injury [73]. Remarkably, elevated levels of migrasomes in urine have been detected prior to the clinical onset of proteinuria, indicating their potential utility as early biomarkers for diagnosing podocyte-associated renal diseases [74]. These findings highlight the promise of migrasomes not only as indicators of podocyte health but also as non-invasive biomarkers for the early detection of renal pathology, potentially allowing for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Migrasomes and proliferative vitreoretinopathy

The occurrence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a significant complication associated with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, which can result in visual impairment [75]. The activation of retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) by cytokines has been demonstrated to be associated with the development of PVR [76]. The migrasome marker TSPAN4 is highly expressed in clinical samples related to PVR, and subsequent investigations have demonstrated that the cytokine TGF-β1 upregulates TSPAN4 expression through activation of RPE, thereby promoting migrasome formation [77]. Migrasomes play a pivotal role in RPE activation and the progression of PVR. Therefore, the targeting of TSPAN4 or the inhibition of migrasome formation may represent innovative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of PVR [77].

Migrasomes and tissue regeneration

Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are mesenchymal stem cells that reside in adipose tissue and actively participate in the regeneration of adipose tissue. It has been demonstrated that local upregulation of the chemokine CXCL12 following tissue injury can effectively recruit ASCs via their receptor CXCR4 [78, 79]. Chen et al. [80] reveals that ASCs produce migrasomes rich in CXCL12, which facilitate the recruitment of ASCs. By activating the CXCR4/RhoA signaling pathway, CXCL12 can attract stem cells and enhance adipose tissue regeneration. These findings suggest that utilizing ASC-derived migrasomes as novel therapeutic targets for ASC-mediated tissue regeneration holds great potential and may have broader applications in regenerative medicine. Li et al. [81]discovered that migrasomes derived from M2 macrophages on titania nanotubes array can enhance bone formation by promoting the osteogenic differentiation capacity of MSCs, indicating that nanosurfaces may serve as a promising platform for generating migrasomes and facilitating the advancement of regenerative medicine.

Perspective

The migration of cells is a crucial phenomenon in the growth and development of multicellular organisms. The discovery of migrasomes has introduced a new dimension to our understanding of cell–cell communication. Functionally, it plays an indispensable role in various biological processes, such as embryogenesis, immune response, wound healing, and cancer cell metastasis. During embryogenesis, cell migration facilitates the precise arrangement of cells into specialized tissues and organs. In adult animals, cell migration serves as a pivotal mechanism underlying numerous physiological and pathological processes [18]. The communication between cells is crucial in multicellular organisms, as it facilitates the exchange of information and coordinated responses. Intercellular communication occurs through various mechanisms, including direct physical contact, interactions between ligands and receptors, and the transfer of EVs [82]. Different biological processes regulate these modes of intercellular communication, and currently no single entity or process can comprehensively control all of them. At this juncture, the migrasome emerges as a critical player. As a novel type of EV associated with cell migration, it has garnered significant attention for its pivotal role in intercellular communication [35]. Notably, migrasomes possess the characteristics of “optimal” carriers for information transfer. They have demonstrated the ability to transmit information through all recognized modes of cell-cell communication. For instance, migrasomes can establish direct contact with other cells to facilitate contact-mediated communication, and they contain bioactive molecules or organelles that can be internalized by recipient cells for material and information exchange. Furthermore, migrasomes are abundant in signaling molecules and possess release mechanisms that enhance ligand-receptor mediated communication [11].

While the functional capabilities of migrasomes are evident, the biogenesis of migrasomes is a highly intricate process that undergoes precise regulation. Extensive research has been conducted on the occurrence process of migrasomes; however, there remain unresolved issues. Firstly, the clustering of SMS2 foci at the leading edge of the migrating cell basal membrane signifies the precise location where migrasome formation occurs [29]. However, the reasons for SMS2 foci clustering in this specific region and the exact mechanism underlying SMS2 foci assembly require further exploration. Secondly, it has been suggested that PIP5K1A is recruited to the site of migrasome formation before migrasome assembly [21], but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Additionally, the study by Dharan et al. [28]has partially addressed the cellular mechanism underlying membrane tension and Tspan-based cluster formation of migrasomes; however, more comprehensive studies are needed to fully elucidate this mechanism.

Considering the role of migrasomes in intercellular communication, identifying reliable markers is crucial for their detection and analysis. The current study suggests that TSPAN4 may serve as such an indicator, prompting further investigation into specific markers associated with migrasomes. However, the existing methods for isolating migrasomes face challenges in ensuring their purity and yield. Validation studies are required to confirm the efficacy of Yang et al.‘s proposed technique [37], which offers a simple and efficient approach for isolating and quantitatively analyzing migrasomes.

Given that migrasomes are closely tied to cell migration, it is reasonable to explore their involvement in pathological processes, such as cancer. Malignant tumor cells exhibit a robust migratory capacity and migrasomes associated with tumors may arise during the migration of these cells [14]. Currently, research on migrasomes in tumors is still in its early stages, primarily focusing on TSPAN4, a known migrasome marker. Studies have shown associations between migrasomes and various cancers, including HCC, GBM, gastric, and esophageal cancers [53, 55,56,57]. However, the exact mechanisms through which migrasomes influence tumor progression or contribute to chemotherapy resistance remain largely unclear. Additional studies are necessary to elucidate these mechanisms and to explore the potential of migrasomes in cancer treatment and diagnosis. For instance, Gu et al. [58]revealed a potential link between migrasomes and secondary bone metastasis in tumors, suggesting that further investigations are needed to develop migrasome-targeted strategies for preventing bone metastasis. In addition to their roles in cancer, migrasomes play a pivotal role in maintaining mitochondrial quality control by eliminating dysfunctional mitochondria [12]. Given that tumor cells exhibit high metabolic efficiency, often leading to mitochondrial damage, an intriguing question arises: do tumor cells exploit migrasomes for their own benefit? This could be one of the mechanisms through which migrasomes facilitate tumor progression. Such possibilities require further investigation to fully understand the implications of migrasomes in both physiological and pathological contexts.

Beyond their direct involvement in tumor biology, migrasomes also interact closely with immune cells, influencing the immune microenvironment. For instance, migrasomes rich in PD-L1 can effectively suppress the immune microenvironment and facilitate tumor metastasis. Therefore, conducting an in-depth investigation into the correlation between migrasomes and PD-L1 will contribute to enhancing the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Furthermore, the study conducted by Lv et al. [65]suggests a potential association between migrasomes and VACA transmission, thereby indicating that inhibiting migrasome formation could be considered as a promising strategy for future development of anti-poxvirus drugs.

Conclusion

Migrasomes represent an exciting frontier in cell biology, offering insights into the intricate mechanisms of cell-cell communication and material transfer. This review highlights the emerging significance of migrasomes in mediating both physiological and pathological processes, underscoring their potential as valuable diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Migrasomes offer a novel paradigm for understanding intercellular communication, with their involvement in diverse disease states such as cancer and cardiovascular disorders. However, many questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding the precise molecular mechanisms governing migrasome biogenesis, cargo sorting, and their interactions with other EVs. Future research should focus on elucidating these pathways, as well as exploring the therapeutic potential of modulating migrasome activity, which could open new avenues for personalized medicine.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

EVs:

Extracellular Vesicles

CXCL12:

C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 12

CXCR4:

C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4

VEGFA:

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

TSPAN4:

Tetraspanin 4; MVBs: Multivesicular Bodies

SM:

Sphingomyelin; SMS2:Sphingomyelin Synthase 2

PI(4,5)P2:

Phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-Bisphosphate

PIP5K1A:

Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate 5-Kinase 1 A

TNFα:

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha

CPQ:

Carboxypeptidase Q

EOGT:

EGF Domain-Specific O-Linked N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase

NDST1:

Bifunctional Heparin Sulfate N-Deacetylase/N-Sulfotransferase 1

PIGK:

Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class K

GFP:

Green Fluorescent Protein

TEM:

Transmission Electron Microscopy

ROCK1:

Rho-Associated Protein Kinase 1

AMI:

Acute Myocardial Infarction

MIRI:

Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

BBB:

Blood-Brain Barrier

References

  1. Lobos-Gonzalez L, Bustos R, Campos A, Silva V, Silva V, Jeldes E, Salomon C, Varas-Godoy M, Caceres-Verschae A, Duran E, et al. Exosomes released upon mitochondrial ASncmtRNA knockdown reduce tumorigenic properties of malignant breast cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cocucci E, Meldolesi J. Ectosomes and exosomes: shedding the confusion between extracellular vesicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25(6):364–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kakarla R, Hur J, Kim YJ, Kim J, Chwae YJ. Apoptotic cell-derived exosomes: messages from dying cells. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Minciacchi VR, Freeman MR, Di Vizio D. Extracellular vesicles in cancer: exosomes, microvesicles and the emerging role of large oncosomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;40:41–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, Liebler DC, Ping J, Liu Q, Evans R, et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–e445418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Acunzo P, Perez-Gonzalez R, Kim Y, Hargash T, Miller C, Alldred MJ, Erdjument-Bromage H, Penikalapati SC, Pawlik M, Saito M et al. Mitovesicles are a novel population of extracellular vesicles of mitochondrial origin altered in down syndrome. Sci Adv 2021, 7(7).

  7. Wang Y, Gao S, Liu Y, Wang D, Liu B, Jiang D, Wong CCL, Chen Y, Yu L. Retractosomes: small extracellular vesicles generated from broken-off Retraction fibers. Cell Res. 2022;32(10):953–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Nedawi K, Meehan B, Micallef J, Lhotak V, May L, Guha A, Rak J. Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(5):619–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang H, Freitas D, Kim HS, Fabijanic K, Li Z, Chen H, Mark MT, Molina H, Martin AB, Bojmar L, et al. Identification of distinct nanoparticles and subsets of extracellular vesicles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(3):332–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao X, Lei Y, Zheng J, Peng J, Li Y, Yu L, Chen Y. Identification of markers for migrasome detection. Cell Discov. 2019;5:27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang D, He J, Yu L. The Migrasome, an organelle for cell-cell communication. Trends Cell Biol. 2025;35(3):205–16.

  12. Jiao H, Jiang D, Hu X, Du W, Ji L, Yang Y, Li X, Sho T, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Mitocytosis, a migrasome-mediated mitochondrial quality-control process. Cell. 2021;184(11):2896–e29102813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu M, Zou Q, Huang R, Li Y, Xing X, Fang J, Ma L, Li L, Yang X, Yu L. Lateral transfer of mRNA and protein by migrasomes modifies the recipient cells. Cell Res. 2021;31(2):237–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang H, Huang Z, Wang M, Luan X, Deng Z, Xu J, Fan W, He D, Zhou C, Wang L, et al. Research progress of migrasomes: from genesis to formation, physiology to pathology. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1420413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Deniz IA, Karbanova J, Wobus M, Bornhauser M, Wimberger P, Kuhlmann JD, Corbeil D. Mesenchymal stromal cell-associated migrasomes: a new source of chemoattractant for cells of hematopoietic origin. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter KR, Claude A, Fullam EF. A study of tissue culture cells by electron microscopy: methods and preliminary observations. J Exp Med. 1945;81(3):233–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor AC, Robbins E. Observations on microextensions from the surface of isolated vertebrate cells. Dev Biol. 1963;6:660–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang D, Yu L. Migrasome biogenesis: when biochemistry Meets biophysics on membranes. Trends Biochem Sci. 2024;49(9):829–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma L, Li Y, Peng J, Wu D, Zhao X, Cui Y, Chen L, Yan X, Du Y, Yu L. Discovery of the Migrasome, an organelle mediating release of cytoplasmic contents during cell migration. Cell Res. 2015;25(1):24–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen L, Ma L, Yu L. WGA is a probe for migrasomes. Cell Discov. 2019;5:13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding T, Ji J, Zhang W, Liu Y, Liu B, Han Y, Chen C, Yu L. The phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate-Rab35 axis regulates migrasome formation. Cell Res. 2023;33(8):617–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu S, Yu L. Migrasome biogenesis and functions. FEBS J. 2022;289(22):7246–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hemler ME. Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(10):801–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubinstein E. The complexity of tetraspanins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011;39(2):501–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Charrin S, le Naour F, Silvie O, Milhiet PE, Boucheix C, Rubinstein E. Lateral organization of membrane proteins: tetraspanins spin their web. Biochem J. 2009;420(2):133–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang Y, Zucker B, Zhang S, Elias S, Zhu Y, Chen H, Ding T, Li Y, Sun Y, Lou J, et al. Migrasome formation is mediated by assembly of micron-scale tetraspanin macrodomains. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(8):991–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dharan R, Goren S, Cheppali SK, Shendrik P, Brand G, Vaknin A, Yu L, Kozlov MM, Sorkin R. Transmembrane proteins tetraspanin 4 and CD9 sense membrane curvature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(43):e2208993119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dharan R, Huang Y, Cheppali SK, Goren S, Shendrik P, Wang W, Qiao J, Kozlov MM, Yu L, Sorkin R. Tetraspanin 4 stabilizes membrane swellings and facilitates their maturation into migrasomes. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang H, Ma X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu N, Zhang W, Chen J, Liu B, Du W, Liu X, et al. The formation of migrasomes is initiated by the assembly of sphingomyelin synthase 2 foci at the leading edge of migrating cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25(8):1173–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao J, Routh AL, Kuyumcu-Martinez MN. Nanopore sequencing reveals full-length Tropomyosin 1 isoforms and their regulation by RNA-binding proteins during rat heart development. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(17):8352–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gagat M, Zielinska W, Mikolajczyk K, Zabrzynski J, Krajewski A, Klimaszewska-Wisniewska A, Grzanka D, Grzanka A. CRISPR-Based activation of endogenous expression of TPM1 inhibits inflammatory response of primary human coronary artery endothelial and smooth muscle cells induced by Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor alpha. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:668032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fan C, Shi X, Zhao K, Wang L, Shi K, Liu YJ, Li H, Ji B, Jiu Y. Cell migration orchestrates migrasome formation by shaping Retraction fibers. J Cell Biol 2022, 221(4).

  33. Jiang D, Jiang Z, Lu D, Wang X, Liang H, Zhang J, Meng Y, Li Y, Wu D, Huang Y, et al. Migrasomes provide regional cues for organ morphogenesis during zebrafish gastrulation. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(8):966–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu P, Liu R, Lu D, Xu Y, Yang X, Jiang Z, Yang C, Yu L, Lei X, Chen Y. Chemical screening identifies ROCK1 as a regulator of migrasome formation. Cell Discov. 2020;6(1):51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Di Daniele A, Antonucci Y, Campello S. Migrasomes, new vescicles as Hansel and Gretel white pebbles? Biol Direct. 2022;17(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma Y, Li T, Zhao L, Zhou D, Dong L, Xu Z, Wang Y, Yao X, Zhao K. Isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicle-like nanoparticles derived from migrasomes. FEBS J. 2023;290(13):3359–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang R, Zhang H, Chen S, Lou K, Zhou M, Zhang M, Lu R, Zheng C, Li L, Chen Q, et al. Quantification of urinary podocyte-derived migrasomes for the diagnosis of kidney disease. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13(6):e12460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ribatti D, Nico B, Crivellato E, Vacca A. Macrophages and tumor angiogenesis. Leukemia. 2007;21(10):2085–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang C, Li T, Yin S, Gao M, He H, Li Y, Jiang D, Shi M, Wang J, Yu L. Monocytes deposit migrasomes to promote embryonic angiogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(12):1726–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang Y, Liu X, Ye J, Ma Y, Mao J, Feng D, Wang X. Migrasomes, a new mode of intercellular communication. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wan S, Wang X, Chen W, Xu Z, Zhao J, Huang W, Wang M, Zhang H. Polystyrene nanoplastics activate autophagy and suppress trophoblast cell migration/invasion and migrasome formation to induce miscarriage. ACS Nano. 2024;18(4):3733–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang Y, Guo W, Bi M, Liu W, Zhou L, Liu H, Yan F, Guan L, Zhang J, Xu J. Migrasomes: From Biogenesis, Release, Uptake, Rupture to Homeostasis and Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022, 2022:4525778.

  43. Mendes SC, Robin C, Dzierzak E. Mesenchymal progenitor cells localize within hematopoietic sites throughout ontogeny. Development. 2005;132(5):1127–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Li T, Su X, Lu P, Kang X, Hu M, Li C, Wang S, Lu D, Shen S, Huang H, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem Cell-Derived Dermcidin-Containing migrasomes enhance LC3-Associated phagocytosis of pulmonary macrophages and protect against Post-Stroke pneumonia. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(22):e2206432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hyun YM, Sumagin R, Sarangi PP, Lomakina E, Overstreet MG, Baker CM, Fowell DJ, Waugh RE, Sarelius IH, Kim M. Uropod elongation is a common final step in leukocyte extravasation through inflamed vessels. J Exp Med. 2012;209(7):1349–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lim K, Hyun YM, Lambert-Emo K, Capece T, Bae S, Miller R, Topham DJ, Kim M. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells in the airways. Science. 2015;349(6252):aaa4352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang M, Xiong C, Mercurio AM. PD-LI promotes Rear Retraction during persistent cell migration by altering integrin beta4 dynamics. J Cell Biol 2022, 221(5).

  49. Qin Y, Yang J, Liang C, Liu J, Deng Z, Yan B, Fu Y, Luo Y, Li X, Wei X, et al. Pan-cancer analysis identifies migrasome-related genes as a potential immunotherapeutic target: A bulk omics research and single cell sequencing validation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:994828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kowal J, Tkach M, Thery C. Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;29:116–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kumar MA, Baba SK, Sadida HQ, Marzooqi SA, Jerobin J, Altemani FH, Algehainy N, Alanazi MA, Abou-Samra AB, Kumar R, et al. Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhu J, Cai T, Zhou J, Du W, Zeng Y, Liu T, Fu Y, Li Y, Qian Q, Yang XH, et al. CD151 drives cancer progression depending on integrin alpha3beta1 through EGFR signaling in non-small cell lung cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang K, Zhu Z, Jia R, Wang NA, Shi M, Wang Y, Xiang S, Zhang Q, Xu L. CD151-enriched migrasomes mediate hepatocellular carcinoma invasion by conditioning cancer cells and promoting angiogenesis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024;43(1):160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Fang R, Chen X, Zhang S, Shi H, Ye Y, Shi H, Zou Z, Li P, Guo Q, Ma L, et al. EGFR/SRC/ERK-stabilized YTHDF2 promotes cholesterol dysregulation and invasive growth of glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Dong Y, Tang X, Zhao W, Liu P, Yu W, Ren J, Chen Y, Cui Y, Chen J, Liu Y. TSPAN4 influences glioblastoma progression through regulating EGFR stability. iScience. 2024;27(8):110417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Qi W, Sun L, Liu N, Zhao S, Lv J, Qiu W. Tetraspanin family identified as the central genes detected in gastric cancer using bioinformatics analysis. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(4):3599–610.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao WS, Yan WP, Chen DB, Dai L, Yang YB, Kang XZ, Fu H, Chen P, Deng KJ, Wang XY, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR activation screening identifies a role of ELAVL2-CDKN1A axis in Paclitaxel resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9(6):1183–200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Gu C, Chen P, Tian H, Yang Y, Huang Z, Yan H, Tang C, Xiang J, Shangguan L, Pan K, et al. Targeting initial tumour-osteoclast Spatiotemporal interaction to prevent bone metastasis. Nat Nanotechnol. 2024;19(7):1044–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schorey JS, Harding CV. Extracellular vesicles and infectious diseases: new complexity to an old story. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(4):1181–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Earnest JT, Hantak MP, Park JE, Gallagher T. Coronavirus and influenza virus proteolytic priming takes place in tetraspanin-enriched membrane microdomains. J Virol. 2015;89(11):6093–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Feneant L, Levy S, Cocquerel L. CD81 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Viruses. 2014;6(2):535–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Levy S, Shoham T. The tetraspanin web modulates immune-signalling complexes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(2):136–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Koupenova M, Corkrey HA, Vitseva O, Tanriverdi K, Somasundaran M, Liu P, Soofi S, Bhandari R, Godwin M, Parsi KM, et al. SARS-CoV-2 initiates programmed cell death in platelets. Circ Res. 2021;129(6):631–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zaid Y, Puhm F, Allaeys I, Naya A, Oudghiri M, Khalki L, Limami Y, Zaid N, Sadki K et al. Ben El Haj R: Platelets Can Associate with SARS-Cov-2 RNA and Are Hyperactivated in COVID-19. Circ Res 2020, 127(11):1404–1418.

  65. Lv L, Zhang L. Identification of poxvirus inside migrasomes suggests a novel mode of Mpox virus spread. J Infect. 2023;87(2):160–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang Y, Wang J, Ding Y, Zhang J, Xu Y, Xu J, Zheng S, Yang H. Migrasome and tetraspanins in vascular homeostasis: concept, present, and future. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Jiang D, Jiao L, Li Q, Xie R, Jia H, Wang S, Chen Y, Liu S, Huang D, Zheng J, et al. Neutrophil-derived migrasomes are an essential part of the coagulation system. Nat Cell Biol. 2024;26(7):1110–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Zheng Y, Lang Y, Qi B, Li T. TSPAN4 and migrasomes in atherosclerosis regression correlated to myocardial infarction and pan-cancer progression. Cell Adh Migr. 2023;17(1):14–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhu Y, Chen Y, Xu J, Zu Y. Unveiling the potential of migrasomes: A Machine-Learning-Driven signature for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction. Biomedicines 2024, 12(7).

  70. Sun P, Li Y, Yu W, Chen J, Wan P, Wang Z, Zhang M, Wang C, Fu S, Mang G, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound improves myocardial ischaemia–reperfusion injury via migrasome-mediated mitocytosis. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14(7):e1749.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hu M, Li T, Ma X, Liu S, Li C, Huang Z, Lin Y, Wu R, Wang S, Lu D, et al. Macrophage lineage cells-derived migrasomes activate complement-dependent blood-brain barrier damage in cerebral amyloid angiopathy mouse model. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):3945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Schmidt-Pogoda A, Strecker JK, Liebmann M, Massoth C, Beuker C, Hansen U, Konig S, Albrecht S, Bock S, Breuer J, et al. Dietary salt promotes ischemic brain injury and is associated with parenchymal migrasome formation. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0209871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Liu Y, Li S, Rong W, Zeng C, Zhu X, Chen Q, Li L, Liu ZH, Zen K. Podocyte-Released migrasomes in urine serve as an indicator for early podocyte injury. Kidney Dis (Basel). 2020;6(6):422–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ardalan M, Hosseiniyan Khatibi SM, Rahbar Saadat Y, Bastami M, Nariman-Saleh-Fam Z, Abediazar S, Khalilov R, Zununi Vahed S. Migrasomes and exosomes; different types of messaging vesicles in podocytes. Cell Biol Int. 2022;46(1):52–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Charteris DG, Sethi CS, Lewis GP, Fisher SK. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy-developments in adjunctive treatment and retinal pathology. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(4):369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Rizzo S, de Angelis L, Barca F, Bacherini D, Vannozzi L, Giansanti F, Faraldi F, Caporossi T. Vitreoschisis and retinal detachment: new insight in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(5):2833–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wu L, Yang S, Li H, Zhang Y, Feng L, Zhang C, Wei J, Gu X, Xu G, Wang Z, et al. TSPAN4-positive migrasome derived from retinal pigmented epithelium cells contributes to the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Girousse A, Gil-Ortega M, Bourlier V, Bergeaud C, Sastourne-Arrey Q, Moro C, Barreau C, Guissard C, Vion J, Arnaud E, et al. The release of adipose stromal cells from subcutaneous adipose tissue regulates ectopic intramuscular adipocyte deposition. Cell Rep. 2019;27(2):323–33. e325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Qin Z, Cai J, Zhou T, Yuan Y, Gao J, Dong Z. External volume expansion Up-Regulates CXCL12 expression and enhances mesenchymal stromal cell recruitment toward expanded prefabricated adipose tissue in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(4):e526–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Chen Y, Li Y, Li B, Hu D, Dong Z, Lu F. Migrasomes from adipose derived stem cells enrich CXCL12 to recruit stem cells via CXCR4/RhoA for a positive feedback loop mediating soft tissue regeneration. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Li G, Zhao Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Cai D, Zhang Y, Song W. The M2 macrophages derived migrasomes from the surface of Titania nanotubes array as a new concept for enhancing osteogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(20):e2400257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. van Niel G, Carter DRF, Clayton A, Lambert DW, Raposo G, Vader P. Challenges and directions in studying cell-cell communication by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(5):369–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Dai J, Su Y, Zhong S, Cong L, Liu B, Yang J, Tao Y, He Z, Chen C, Jiang Y. Exosomes: key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy. Signal Transduct Target Therapy 2020, 5(1).

  84. Jayachandran M, Miller VM, Heit JA, Owen WG. Methodology for isolation, identification and characterization of microvesicles in peripheral blood. J Immunol Methods. 2012;375(1–2):207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sedgwick AE, D’Souza-Schorey C. The biology of extracellular microvesicles. Traffic. 2018;19(5):319–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Crescitelli R, Lässer C, Szabó TG, Kittel A, Eldh M, Dianzani I, Buzás EI, Lötvall J. Distinct RNA profiles in subpopulations of extracellular vesicles: apoptotic bodies, microvesicles and exosomes. J Extracell Vesicles 2013, 2(1).

  87. Miao X, Wu X, You W, He K, Chen C, Pathak JL, Zhang Q. Tailoring of apoptotic bodies for diagnostic and therapeutic applications:advances, challenges, and prospects. J Translational Med 2024, 22(1).

  88. Ciardiello C, Migliorino R, Leone A, Budillon A. Large extracellular vesicles: size matters in tumor progression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;51:69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Di Vizio D, Kim J, Hager MH, Morello M, Yang W, Lafargue CJ, True LD, Rubin MA, Adam RM, Beroukhim R, et al. Oncosome formation in prostate cancer: association with a region of frequent chromosomal deletion in metastatic disease. Cancer Res. 2009;69(13):5601–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Patton MC, Zubair H, Khan MA, Singh S, Singh AP. Hypoxia alters the release and size distribution of extracellular vesicles in pancreatic cancer cells to support their adaptive survival. J Cell Biochem. 2019;121(1):828–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Jeppesen DK, Zhang Q, Franklin JL, Coffey RJ. Extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles: emerging complexities. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33(8):667–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 82060464, grant No. 82260609, grant No.82360603), Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (grant No. 202001AY070001-163, grant No. 202201AU070220, grant No. 202201AY070001-113, grant No. 202401AU070010), Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Project (grant No. 2024J0225), the First-Class Discipline Team of Kunming Medical University (grant No.2024XKTDYS03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Haifeng Wang and Mingxia Ding: Supervision, Project administration, and Funding acquisition. Zhiyong Tan, Chadanfeng Yang and Junchao Wu: Writing original draft and Investigation. Yinglong Huang and Shi Fu: Interpretation of the data. Lihai Hao, Chen Gong and Dihao Lv: Preparing the figures. Jiansong Wang: Manuscript revision. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mingxia Ding or Haifeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, Z., Yang, C., Fu, S. et al. Migrasomes, critical players in intercellular communication. Cancer Cell Int 25, 113 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12935-025-03754-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12935-025-03754-6

Keywords